sábado, 7 de novembro de 2009

David Gordon Green: Complete Filmography


George Washington (2000) ****½ / *****


"They used to get around, walkin' around, lookin' at stuff. They used to try to find clues to all the mysteries and mistakes God had made."

Photobucket

Kids teetering on teenagehood and adulthood, an industrialized landscape veering into decay and reclamation by the wild countryside from which it arose, a lyrical Southern tone poem verging on Faulkneresque drama - all these are the raw elements used by George Washington in its vivid depiction of a group of kids during a long-gone summer. These predominantly African-American kids between the ages of 8 and 14 are something special, not so much because of who they are and what they do - very little actually happens - but because of how David Gordon Green (making his feature film debut, at age 25) opens up these lives to us by slowing down our dramatic expectations and drawing us into the rhythms of their language and activities.

The film opens with two said kids talking. Nasia (Candace Evanofski) is breaking up with Buddy (Curtis Cotton III), who is still crazy about her. "Did you think we were going to be together forever?" she asks him. When he asks for a last kiss, she asks, after a pause, "Tell me that you love me. Do you love me?" And Buddy remains silent and looks away. They speak in slow, flat tones, but with sincerity, and there's an undertone of sadness and loss. The scene feels authentic; it may have been improvised, as some parts of George Washington surely were. There are pauses in the conversation as these kids grope to express feelings that they barely understand, no less have the words to articulate.

The next we see of her, Nasia has found herself a new boyfriend, George (Donald Holden), who wears a football helmet to protect his head which is vulnerable due to a soft cranium. George, being a boy, has big dreams - to live forever, to be president of the United States - while Nasia, a girl, is more focused on the practical and the here-and-now: she wants to see George waving a flag in the Fourth of July parade. While these poor kids seem to function in a comfortably racially-mixed milieu, that Fourth of July parade is all white and middle-class and George does not get to march. Ironically, with his physical vulnerability, he's not the one to suffer the serious blow to the head. But he does become a hero, diving into a swimming pool to rescue another kid who is drowning. After that he adapts a super-hero costume - tights and an improvised cape. "If no one would look after him," observes Nasia, "at least they would look at him."

Candace Evanofski's molasses-toned voice-over narration reminds us of the mournfully matter-of-fact cadences of Linda Manz's voice-over in Terrence Malick's Days of Heaven, a film with which George Washington is often compared. The only things the two films share, however, is a similar tone, a pensive yet peaceful reflection on a moment in time that has passed, and a look that finds the beauty and grace in the plainness of forgotten towns and its many landscapes.

Filmed in North Carolina, George Washington's lovely camerawork by Tim Orr locates the cohabiting nuances of the area's simultaneous rural and urban decay. It's a region that Americans may know - from having visited it or simply learned about it in their history books - but that the rest of the world rarely sees on film, and a region whose children are even less likely to be seen and heard. George Washington delights in their voices, slowing things down to listen to what they - and even the adults - have to say. The haunting drone of the music by Michael Linnen and David Wingo handsomely complements the film's progression and flow. The pace, and what characters say, and how they pass the time, and their geographic influences...

These sorts of things, rather than plot, form the real crux of George Washington. And what these kids have to say is eye-opening, especially for those accustomed to Hollywood's formulaic kid stereotypes. Not exactly miniature adults, this largely pre-teen group nevertheless express themselves with confidence, sensitivity, and honesty. Sometimes, like the scene in which Nasia and her girlfriends of various ages are combing each other's hair and talking about boys, the maturity of their judgements impresses the viewer. Then, at other times, the vastness of what they don't yet know or understand also leaves its mark.

The film is filled with hypnotic, dreamlike images. It's lovely. A stunningly assured directorial debut, it's absolutely lyrical in beauty, which makes the fact that it was directed by a first timer all the more impressive. Perhaps it is precisely because this is the director's first feature that he is able to create such a wonderful sense of innocence. Green gets remarkable performances out of a cast that is almost entirely comprised of amateurs. He's not afraid to make squalor look beautiful, and one gets the impression that by making the film look as good as he does, Green wants us to not judge the film based on its surroundings, but to rather look at the universal applications of its themes. That George Washington manages to say so much, and still remain filled with subtlety and warmth makes it feel like an aberration among the American films that are shoved down the world's throaths everyday.

"Sometimes I smile and laugh when I think of all the great things you're gonna do. I hope you live forever."

All the Real Girls (2003) **** / *****

"Do you wanna know a secret that I didn't tell anybody ever?... You know how ducks fly home in a V? It's like a v-shape when they get home? I was walking my dog and I looked up and there's this big V above me, there's all these ducks flying back to their home. And right when they flew above me, I saw 'em and, they crashed into a big house! The whole V! And then, they hit the ground, and they just kinda curled up. You ever fucking see that? Have you ever seen a mistake in nature? Have you ever seen an animal make a mistake?"

Photobucket

David Gordon Green's All the Real Girls (the follow-up to his astonishing 2000 debut George Washington) exhibits the same gently lackadaisical rhythm and acute perception of human joy and misery that made his debut such a success, even as it charts new territory. A dreamy tale of the wondrous elation and sometimes terrible sorrow that accompanies love, the Sundance hit - about the budding relationship between an immature womanizer and the sister of his best friend - occasionally threatens to devolve into laughable sentimentality. But Green's assured direction and two outstanding lead performances never allow this minor masterpiece to lose its course, and the results are a sumptuous romance that pulsates with the passionate ecstasy of the smitten heart.

Paul (co-writer Paul Schneider) is a standard guy working for his uncle and living with his mother in the same house he's always called home, and his abundant sexual conquests have earned him a well-deserved reputation as a licentious heartbreaker. He spends his free time with a group of lifelong buddies, drinking and looking for his next female conquest. As one former girlfriend wisely observes, Paul's the type of sleazy good-for-nothing who'll never amount to more than what he is now: a drunken, childish fool with no ambition. His mother puts it more bluntly: Paul is "not educated, honest, or strong."

But beneath that callous exterior lies a surprisingly tender soul, and Paul's world changes with the reappearance of his friend Tip's sibling, a wide-eyed ingénue named Noel (the enchanting Zooey Deschanel) who's been cooped up in an all-girl boarding school since the age of 12. Despite the objections of Tip (Shea Whigham) - who's familiar with both his sister's innocence and his pal's history of thoughtless carousing - Paul and Noel are magnetically drawn to one another, and it's not long before their casual conversations evolve into heartfelt glances, stolen kisses, and innocent nights spent under the covers. The outside world gives way as the two - concealed in a timeless small-town paradise of towering ferns, beaten down dirt roads, and quiet, still air - develop a blissful companionship, convinced that their feelings for each other are unique in the annals of history. Tim Orr's stunningly delicate, golden-hued cinematography seems to envelop the young lovers in a warm blanket of sunshine, protecting them as they float through life in a state of idyllic rapture.

As both a director and a writer, Green is uninterested in disingenuous clichés and poses, and his rejection of the genre's most hackneyed conventions comes in the form of unabashed sincerity. In his film's corny, love-struck dialogue - spoken with the gravity that comes from people wholly enraptured by their new-found emotions - Green captures the raw immediacy of Paul and Noel's exhilarating affair. The film stares directly into the face of melodramatic mawkishness, and doesn't blink; All the Real Girls transcends the corniness of its dialogue through the earnestness of Green's conviction. At one point, Noel gingerly tells Paul "I like it when you smile at me," and her words have the vulnerable honesty and the lyrical grace of a poem.

Their daydreaming, however, cannot last forever, and a disastrous decision leaves the young couple at a crossroads. Green, having immersed us in the intense atmosphere of blossoming passion, doesn't shy away from the painful consequences that caring for someone frequently entails, and he makes it clear that Paul and Noel's despair doesn't exist in a vacuum. The film reveals a town littered with the walking wounded: Paul's uncle Leland (Benjamin Mouton), still reeling from the death of his wife, has vowed to never get that close to someone again; his single mother Elvira (Patricia Clarkson), entertains hospitalized children dressed as a clown in order to alleviate her loneliness; and Tip learns a hard lesson about the ramifications of his reckless behaviour.

Green is often compared to legendary recluse Terrence Malick, and his fascination with images of nature - a river glistening in the sunlight, a crippled dog hobbling along a dusty road - imbues the seemingly ordinary with a mythical import that recalls Malick's ethereal work from the 70s. Yet unlike his kindred directorial spirit, Green is keenly attuned to his actors' strengths and weaknesses and, in Schneider and Deschanel, he has found a pair of brave performers willing to embrace material hovering on the edge of preciousness.

Schneider and Deschanel share an unaffected, easygoing chemistry that only grows more spellbinding as Paul and Noel's relationship begins to crumble under the weight of mistakes and regrets both past and present. Throughout, Green shelters their performances with steadfast grace and respect. In doing so, he has crafted a timeless portrait of two individuals' awkward, euphoric first encounter with love. And it feels as real as anything I've ever seen.

"I'm looking at you right now and I hear you talking and all the words that are coming out of your mouth are like they're coming out of a stranger. Why don't you put your fucking hair back on and come back, just come on back?"

Undertow (2004) **** / *****

"Let me see your knife. Can I carve my name in your face?"

David Gordon Green's Undertow tells a story "based on true events that was all a lie," as he describes it. While many people have been quick to draw comparison's to Charles Laughton's classic Night of the Hunter, Undertow is actually based on a 911 call from a frantic young man telling the operator some crazy stories that may or may not have been true. The film takes the stories as truth, but not without shrouding certain aspects of it in ambiguity. As with all Green's films, clear, concise narrative takes a back-seat to atmosphere and a strong emotional landscape that tells a bigger story than the one written in the plot descriptions.

Photobucket

Green's third film opens with a sequence that's at once visceral and baffling. Deep in the rural American South, Chris Munn (Jamie Bell), a sullen teenager with a mean twist to his mouth, throws a rock through the house of this girl, Lila (Kristen Stewart), he's been seeing. When her father emerges with a shotgun, he flees, taking refuge at a work shed where he leaps blindly onto a board with a nail jutting out of it. As he continues to run, shocked with pain, the board now affixed to the bottom of his foot, the filmmaker keeps freezing the frame - a stylistic tic that suggests there's more to what we're seeing than meets the eye. The same can be said of Undertow.

Green, it turns out, has made an art film posing as a backwoods gothic thriller. (Or is it the other way around?) The troublesome, but good-hearted Chris returns to the tumbledown home he shares with his little brother Tim (Devon Alan), a sickly dreamer who has a secret obsession with sipping paint and other stuff (hence his chronic intestinal trouble), and the pair's bedraggled father, John (Dermot Mulroney), a hog farmer and taxidermist who gruffly looks after the two boys after his wife's death.

The setting, and indeed the whole sinister hick-trash, Southern vibe of the place, suggests Faulkner by way of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and the floating ominousness is soon upped with the arrival of Deel (Josh Lucas), the boys' uncle, a grinning ex-con who comes on all friendly but is clearly up to no good. In the attempt of not disclosing much, let's just say bad stuff happens and the two brothers run away from home, taking with them a dark family secret in the form of mysterious gold coins. From there, they meet many Southern locals, some hospitable, some mysterious. Uncle Deel - Green's most menacing character yet - spends days searching for them.

DGG continues to set himself apart from other filmmakers of his generation, opting for sincerity over irony and soulfulness over cynicism. Here, though, Green makes his first attempt at action and chases. Using freeze-frames, negative colour, Tim Orr's (his one and only DP) gritty cinematography and a restrained, yet comical score from Phillip Glass, he evokes '70s drive-in films as well as sun-drenched gothic thrillers. With an assured command over the medium that evokes Malick as well as Altman (two of his main influences), Green re-re-establishes himself as an indisputable filmmaking talent and the best of his generation.

Because he also encourages his actors to improvise, Green's films achieve an uncommon naturalism within their poetic undertones. A character can segue into a discussion about how he once saw a flock of birds kill themselves by flying straight into a house, or in this case a monologue about chigger bugs and it will sound completely conversational, even though it carries much weight. Unlike many of his contemporaries, Green does not use dialogue to call attention to his own prose, but to call attention to how his characters feel.

Once again, he gets the best out of his actors. Jamie Bell, that English kid who played Billy Elliot, fits Green's directorial style perfectly. Brooding, vulnerable and fuelled by anger without succumbing to its worst temptations, he makes Chris Munn into a character one would study in a classic piece of literature. Devon Alan gives a wonderful performance as the fragile, young Tim. Unlike many of Hollywood's young stars of his generation, Alan does not give the impression he's acting, but actually communicating. As Uncle Deel, Josh Lucas teeters on the brink of going way over the top, but reels it in just in time. Dermot Mulroney is fine too, and very well casted.

Green's first three films all take place in the South, but none of them reduces its characters to Southern archetypes. In George Washington, the African-American characters never face any racism or bigotry from the white characters, a trait that some viewers criticized. Here, the supporting characters blend seamlessly into the rusty, mud-soaked landscape as both character and scenery without forcing negative, dumb-as-a-brick connotations to the tapestry. Nature plays a big part in the narrative and Green knows how to have his characters and setting coexist peacefully even when enduring family tragedy, heartbreak and violence.

I remember when I saw All the Real Girls for the first time and not being able to get out of my seat once the film ended. That film had a profound effect on me as a viewer, as a lover of cinema and as a human being who has had his share of love and heartbreak. Undertow did not have the same effect, nor did I expect it to. It's not a love story, but a story that depicts brotherly love in the face of violence. Either way, love tends to be part of it. It remains amazing to me that a director this young can convey these themes with uncommon authenticity, style and wisdom. Green knows a thing or two about telling the truth. And about making great films.

Snow Angels (2007) ****½ / *****


"It's funny how you can tell the fake smiles in pictures. You notice people don't bring out cameras on sad days?"

Photobucket

Based on the richly textured novel by Stewart O'Nan, Snow Angels is a searing portrait of three interconnected families living in a small Pennsylvania town, their lives affected and, in some cases, irretrievably altered through a series of tragic events. As faithfully adapted for the screen and directed by David Gordon Green, the film's escalating power and cumulative emotional impact can only be attributed to the care that this incredibly perceptive and poetic filmmaker brings to the project. Both in his depiction of a wintry landscape of lost souls and in his painfully accurate portrayal of characters struggling to make their way in a world that oft-times seems cruelly unfair and confusing, Snow Angels rings resoundingly true.

Representative of four relationships in varying states of growth or disrepair, the film's centre of gravity is teenager Arthur Parkinson (Michael Angarano), who watches as his parents, Louise (Jeanetta Arnette) and Don (Griffin Dunne), mutually separate and his college professor father moves out of the house. At school, the cutely bespectacled Lila (Olivia Thirlby) has her eyes on him, but her obvious attempts at starting something romantic are lost upon Arthur, who can't imagine someone would be interested in him.

At his job as a busboy at a local Chinese restaurant, he works alongside his former babysitter Annie (Kate Beckinsale), at the time a teen herself and now a somewhat hardened and overworked mother going through a difficult divorce with perpetual screw-up of a husband Glenn (Sam Rockwell). Against her better judgement, Annie has begun a seedy affair with Nate Petite (Nicky Katt) behind the back of his wife and her best friend and co-worker Barb (Amy Sedaris). When the unthinkable strikes after Annie's and Glenn's 4-year-old daughter Tara (Gracie Hudson) goes missing, it is the catalyst for everyone to finally face what they mean to each other and where they stand in the choices they've made.

Snow Angels begins with what could only be looked at as a harbinger of doom to come. Arthur's marching band practice on the high school football field is suddenly disrupted when two nearby gunshots ring out in the frosty air. Rewinding the clock by several weeks, the film aims to explore what leads to this fateful moment in time, and for 106 minutes, Green holds us in rapt attention even as we occasionally find ourselves shrinking down in our seats, aware (even if subconsciously) of the inevitable conclusion being built toward. While there are light-hearted moments to be had, and the adorably burgeoning relationship between Arthur and Lila offers glimmers of revelatory hope, Snow Angels is extremely bleak and uncompromising in its tone and narrative turns. At the same time, save for a somewhat forced opening monologue by the overbearing band leader, the film is never less than glaringly authentic.

The ensemble of characters are true originals, feeling, looking and sounding like real people rather than vaguely developed screenplay pawns. In the very specific milieu Green is working within, his characters are flawed, sometimes troubled, but sympathetic even in spite of some of the less savoury choices they make. All of them are simply trying to navigate the circumstances they've found themselves in and, unfortunately, a map has not been made to guide them.

In a film of emotionally rattling moments, it is in the smaller, quieter interludes of human connection and reflection that are often most poignant. The way, for example, that Arthur gives Lila a pencil from his locker as a spur-of-the-moment present, is naive in the extreme, and yet exactly why Lila is charmed by him. A conversation they later have in Arthur's bedroom where he tells her about his remembrances of having Annie as a babysitter are heartbreaking in their subtle comments on the way innocuous childhood memories have a way of holding greater nostalgic value years later. Another moment in which Arthur and his mum reminisce over a photo album is unpredictably insightful.

As with all the other four films Green has directed, the actors in Snow Angels are all doing some of the best work they've ever had in their careers, clearly delighted to be able to sink their teeth into unusually complex, three-dimensional roles. As Arthur, Angarano is just about as good as it gets for male actors of his late-teen/early-twenties age group. He has an everyman quality about him that makes him instantly identifiable, but also the kind of face that you just want to hug. He is perfect as Arthur, an otherwise ordinary teenager whose sensitivity and heart run a little deeper than most. Because of this notion, he and Lila, an embracer of the offbeat who refuses to conform to stereotypes, make for an undeniably sweet couple. Olivia Thirlby is an utter delight as Lila, worldly and intelligent yet mischievous and vulnerable.

As the morally torn Annie, Beckinsale is a revelation. When you put aside the vampire-killing roles, she has been superb in the past (in Emma, Haunted, The Aviator) but, sort of like Jennifer Aniston in The Good Girl, she's never been given the chance to essay a role with quite so many layers and interior demands. She's obviously a gorgeous woman, but Green shoots her like the saddest one in the world, and it helps her to completely dig into the darker corners of a person's psyche. Her final on-screen look and utterance of "Oh my..." is especially haunting. It's usually the kind of performance that wins Oscars, if we were talking about a "bigger" film, of course.

In perhaps the most difficult part to pull off, Sam Rockwell is mesmerizing as Glenn, a man who can't seem to ever do right - his forgetting to bring a stuffed bunny he has bought for Tara on one of the their days spent together is particularly symbolic of this - and whose mounting religious faith is at direct odds with the actions he takes in the third act. In lesser hands, Glenn could have become over-the-top and too broadly played, but Rockwell makes him as credible as the rest of the characters. As an actor who's been in more than thirty films in less than two decades, it never ceases to amaze me how Rockwell can make you laugh hysterically one moment and break your heart the next.

Emanating a sense that what happens to these characters not only could happen in real life, but has, Snow Angels is mesmerizing in its sharp, fully-realized gaze at lives approaching a crossroads from which only some of them will reach the other side. Beautifully photographed by Tim Orr, taking advantage of his chilly, ice-drenched setting, it's ultimately such a provocative and effective film because of how David Gordon Green handles the tough material, lending equal weight to both the extraordinary and deceptively mundane moments of life in motion that make all of us startlingly, stingingly and intensely human.

"I forgive you. I don't even know you, but I forgive you."

Pineapple Express (2008) **** / *****

[he examines the joint]
Saul: "It's almost a shame to smoke it. It's like killing a unicorn... with, like, a bomb."

Photobucket

I was never a fan of stoner comedies. I mean, I like to smoke pot as much as the next guy, but I've always had a hard time getting into the humour those films usually offer. The only real pothead comedies that I truly enjoy are The Big Lebowski, Up in Smoke, and a large portion of the Harold & Kumar misadventures. Frankly I'm of the opinion that most pot comedies feel like they were written by someone very stoned, and let's just say that writers don't always do their best work when they're extra-baked. (They might THINK their stuff is hilarious, but usually it's not. That's just the weed talking.) You'll definitely find a few cannabis-caked giggles in trash like Half-Baked, Grandma's Boy, and Smiley Face - just not enough to sustain a whole film, if it's me you're asking.

So it is with much pleasure, enthusiasm, and recently-applied Visine that I find myself completely in love with Pineapple Express, which just may be the Casablanca of stoner films. Or perhaps it's more like "When Ultra-High Harry Met Super-Stoned Sally," but either way Pineapple Express isn't just hilarious, it's pretty damn sharp and clever too. It has some of the funniest "weed culture" insights since Richard Linklater's fantastic Dazed & Confused - which I wouldn't call a full-bore pot comedy, but it sure isn't shy about passing those joints around. Best of all, while Pineapple Express will absolutely appeal to both the casual and committed pot-smokers, it's also just a very funny buddy comedy/action flick parody that comes bearing the very unique stamp of that unique director that is David Gordon Green.

How ironic (and downright miraculous) is it that a filmmaker who has been making art (not just "movies") for almost a decade eventually ended up directing a guns & weed comedy starring Seth Rogen and James Franco? And if you think the guy's dry, low-key, and slyly sober style has been squashed by the Hollywood Movie Machine, then you're in for a big treat with this flick. Pineapple Express is certainly "accessible" in true multiplex fashion, but it also has several memorable touches of strange wit, unexpected character, and just plain old random weirdness - you can tell you're in the hands of a filmmaker who actually wants to deliver a big, odd concoction of a film.

The plot is enjoyably simple: Two potheads find themselves on the run from a crooked cop and a violent drug lord after one of the stoners accidentally witnesses a murder. (The title refers to the world's most powerful marijuana, so intoxicating that apparently it smells like "god's vagina.") So while early word on Pineapple Express has called it a partial homage to the buddy action comedies of the 1980s, what I saw in this film comes from a decidedly late-'70s format. Imagine if Richard Rush or Don Siegel had directed the first Cheech & Chong film, and that's what Pineapple Express feels like to me. And that feels good.

"A dude, a lady, and a cop? That's like a massacre, man!"

We all know Seth Rogen's a very funny guy by this point and he does a very fine job of creating a central nebbish who simply wants to enjoy his weed and get through life without bothering anyone. As his partner in perpetual paranoia, the normally stoic James Franco is allowed to let his hair down here and have an absolute ball with his role. (If you've never seen "Freaks & Geeks," then you'll probably be shocked to learn that Franco has such comedy chops. I, however, was very entertained but not at all surprised.) Best of all, Rogen and Franco strike a fantastic chemistry together (which isn't surprising either, since they've known each other since they were teenagers), with the former a neurotic and self-centered (but ultimately sweet) nobody and the latter a soft-spoken and frequently clueless (but occasionally insightful) weed-sponge.

As is always the case when Rogen and Judd Apatow are on the job, the bong is over-packed with colourful supporting characters. Once again we have a film that all but screams "This Danny McBride dude is FUNNY!" (This guy redefines the phrase "scene-stealer," particularly as part of one of the funniest film brawls I've ever witnessed.) As the snarling bad guys, Gary Cole and Rosie Perez are clearly having a lot of fun riffing off each other. Even more arcane antics come from the likes of Kevin Corrigan, Craig Robinson, Bill Hader, Ken Jeong, Amber Heard ... plus we get some of the funniest stuff from Nora Dunn and Ed Begley Jr. ("Angie, you're a fucking idiot. I say that with love.") in quite some time. I chuckle just thinking about it. Enthusiastic film geeks who buy a ticket for Pineapple Express hoping for some choice "quotables" will NOT go away disappointed.

"You just got killed by a Daewoo Lanos, motherfucker!"

Pineapple Express is, of course, an unapologetically raunchy, appreciably scrappy, and exceedingly violent little comedy, and it's a "matinee for relative grown-ups" that will almost certainly entertain its intended audience. Green and company keep the material moving at a very brisk clip, some of the more conventional comedy stops are interrupted by unexpected sequences of admirable... weirdness, and the whole thing looks like it was as much fun to shoot as it was to watch. And even if you wouldn't know weed from green wool, Pineapple Express works as a fast-paced buddy comedy with lots of laughs and a few hilariously unpleasant surprises. It's not exactly a "dark" comedy, but it sure isn't scared of making mirth out of morbidity. Let's say that once the bullets start flying, Franco becomes Bugs Bunny and Rogen becomes Daffy Duck. And you know what those guys do to their enemies.

"War is upon you! Prepare to suck the cock of karma!"

In other words, I liked this flick a lot, not just because it gave me some "funny pot schtick" from a bunch of entertaining actors and it's directed by a man I admire immensely - but because it's a comedy that takes chances, hearkens back to a weirder generation, and doles out as many surprises as it does big laughs. I'd call it a near-perfect mix between art-house cleverness and mainstream amusement. Plus, man, it's worth seeing just for Franco's frequently fried facial expressions. This guy should never do "drama" again.

Saul: "BFFF?
Dale: Best Fuckin' Friends Forever, man!"

Review: Happy-Go-Lucky

**** / *****

"You keep on rowin', and I'll keep on smilin'."

Film-goers, novel-readers, TV-watchers and culture-consumers spread through our little planet generally are now on a continuous yellow alert for irony; narrators of every kind are regarded as about as trustworthy as the patio-building stepfather at the televised press conference, pleading for his partner's 15-year-old daughter to return home. So when irony appears to be withheld or abolished, the natural reaction is suspicion.

Photobucket

You could be forgiven for assuming that the title of Mike Leigh's latest film must surely be ironic. Happy-Go-Lucky? It's difficult to say the phrase out loud in anything other than a sarcastic voice. Leigh's last film, Vera Drake, was, after all, a harrowing dark masterpiece about the darkest corners of the human co-existence, and the titles of many of his films (Life Is Sweet, High Hopes) appear to signal that despite elements of sweetness, richness and happiness - always under-acknowledged in Leigh's films - there is irony at some level.

But not here. And with this title, Leigh boldly challenges our easy assumptions about realism, pessimism and irony itself. It describes the heroine, Poppy, who is vividly played by Leigh regular Sally Hawkins, here stepping up to her first lead role, and carrying it off with terrific confidence and gusto. She is a north London infant school teacher who is, well, happy-go-lucky. That galumphing, slack-jawed phrase is the only one that does justice to her relentless chirpiness. She has just turned 30, and lives with her best mate Zoe (Alexis Zegerman) in a rented flat. She is happy to be single, goes clubbing with her mates and her younger sister who love her, and the kids at her school love her, too. She speaks in an unending sort of U-certificate larky-sarky backtalk, which is never funny in the way it might be if it was scripted as such, yet neither is it exactly unfunny, because Poppy's ingenuous childlike enthusiasm makes it impossible to take offence.

You can spend the first 20 minutes of Happy-Go-Lucky, or maybe the entire film, in a state of unbearable, nerve-wrecking tension. When is Poppy's secret tragedy or horror going to be disclosed? When will that smiley face turn into a scowl? When will we discover what past, hidden trauma she's been through? When is she going to be revealed to be a self-harmer, a kleptomaniac, a Nazi, or a prat? When, for fuck's sake?

The answer is never. But dark things do happen to Poppy. She has an uneasy encounter with her second sister, married and pregnant, who reproaches her for not caring about her future, though this situation calms itself presently. She spots a boy being bullied in the playground, and calls in a social worker, though this itself is to open up a glorious opportunity in her personal life. Most seriously, she finds that her driving instructor Scott (Eddie Marsan) is an angry paranoid racist who is developing a sinister obsession with her. Yet even this situation - which in another sort of film would provide the violent and despair-inducing finale - is something that she handles with courage, intelligence and tact. The film, like Poppy's life, just free-wheels along, swerving amiably this way and that. There is a very funny and good-natured scene where she has a flamenco lesson, which Leigh puts in for the same reason Poppy takes the class: for a laugh.

The part played by Mike Leigh in shaping the British TV comedy idiom has been exhaustively discussed: and it becomes relevant again here. Poppy is sometimes as maladroit, in her way, as David Brent, yet not contemptible, because she is without vanity. (She's closer to Caroline Aherne in "The Royle Family".) Interestingly, a tiny non-speaking role for the actress Rebekah Staton, who is in the current BBC comedy series "Pulling," reminded me of that show's horrific character Karen, played by Tanya Franks. Like Poppy she's an infant schoolteacher who is surrounded by mates; unlike Poppy she is nasty, unhappy, scriptedly witty and addicted to booze, drugs and casual sex. Karen is the polar opposite of Poppy, who lives in a world without irony. Unlike Karen, or Brent, she is genuinely nice. The happy-go-luckiness of the film therefore asks us questions: why are we so comfortable with irony? Is it a dishonest cop-out? Do we affect to disbelieve in happiness because we're afraid of being humiliated by life's reversals? Have we spinelessly given up on happiness, in art as in life?

Maybe. Happy-Go-Lucky has been extravagantly admired since it premiered at Berlin earlier this year, and I find myself liking it more and more. Leigh's trademarked cartoony dialogue, as ever lending a neo-Dickensian compression and intensity to the proceedings, is an acquired taste and I have gladly acquired it, though some haven't. I'm not quite sure what I think about the big, final confrontation between Poppy and Scott. It is well-acted and composed, and Marsan is ferociously convincing, yet the episode is closed off a little too neatly, and Poppy seems eerily unaffected by this or anything else. The effect is a kind of odd and steely invulnerability: not unattractive exactly, but disconcerting.

Hawkins plays it superbly though: exactly right for the part and utterly at ease with a role that is uniquely demanding. It truly is one of the first great female performances of the year, and the proof that Mike Leigh is the man to work with, if you're an actor and you're ready for excellence. In the factory-farmed blandness of Film these days, Happy-Go-Lucky has a strong, real taste. Not always sweet ... but real.

Review: Burn After Reading

**** / *****

"Oh my fuck... I just killed a fucking spook!"

One thing about the Coen brothers - you never know what to expect when you sit down to watch one of their films. This is especially true of their comedies, which can range from lowbrow slapstick (Raising Arizona, O Brother, Where Art Thou?) to chilly, intellectual aloofness (The Man Who Wasn't There). As for their latest, Burn After Reading, I just watched it twice and I still don't know what to make of it. It's an intense political thriller filled with intrigue, except that there aren't any politics and the intrigue all stems from a complex web of misunderstanding, paranoia, and just plain stupidity. It's like a Bourne film in which Matt Damon has been replaced with the Three Stooges.

Photobucket

John Malkovich plays Osbourne Cox, a low-level CIA analyst who quits in a huff after being demoted due to a drinking problem, and then sets about writing his memoirs, which somehow end up in the hands of Linda (Frances McDormand) and Chad (Brad Pitt), a pair in which unextraordinarity abounds and who work at a health club. Certain that they've stumbled onto some vital classified information, Linda and Chad attempt to blackmail Cox so that Linda can finally afford a series of cosmetic surgeries that will improve her social life. When Cox refuses to pay, they take the floppy disc to the Russian embassy, where a bemused official named Krapotkin doesn't know what to make of it or them.

Meanwhile, Cox's ice-cold wife Katie (Tilda Swinton) is having an affair with their health-nut friend Harry (George Clooney), a sex addict who has also hooked up with Linda through a computer dating service. Katie's planning to divorce Osbourne and marry Harry, while Harry still loves his wife (who's planning to divorce him and is having him shadowed by a detective) and also is falling for Linda. When Linda sends Chad to Osbourne's house to try and dig up more secret information, he runs into Harry, who thinks he's a spy. The increasingly paranoid Harry then discovers that Linda's involved in the whole thing and thinks she's a spy, too. An important element in all this is that Harry's job requires him to carry a gun, which isn't a good idea under the circumstances.

It's a hard story to put into a nutshell, and it's even harder to convey just how goofy and off-the-wall this film is. All the trappings of the political potboiler are here - car chases, shootings, break-ins, deceptions, people being followed by shadowy figures, the whole bunch - but while one half of the cast is made up of serious people living their lives in the really real world, the other half is composed of colossal idiots blundering their way into this serious milieu and gumming up the works with catastrophic results.

The Coens direct it like a straight-faced thriller with the chameleon-like Carter Burwell supplying a pulse-pounding musical score, and their deadpan approach to this material makes it delightfully fun to watch. It's also wonderfully unpredictable - I dare anyone to try and figure out what's going to happen next at any point in the story - with one or two developments that are wild enough to give the viewer whiplash. Like Janet Leigh's fatal shower in Psicho or the jaw-dropping ending of To Live and Die in L.A., this story often manages to whip the rug right out from under us with prankish glee.

Frances McDormand gives us another quirky, memorable Coen character here, but unlike Fargo's Marge Gundersen, her Linda Litzke is a ditzy wacko. Brad Pitt has a great time playing the equally idiotic Chad, and together they make quite a pair. George Clooney is hilarious as the increasingly frazzled Harry, whose life is flying to pieces around him for reasons he can't even begin to understand. Malkovich, of course, is fascinating to watch as the equally paranoid Osbourne Cox, as he tries to figure out who the hell Linda and Chad are and what insidious government conspiracy is closing in around him.

As his wife Katie, Tilda Swinton is about as cold and ruthless a bitch as you could imagine. Another Coen regular, Richard Jenkins, expertly underplays his part as usual and is probably the film's most sympathetic character. In lesser roles, David Rasche and J.K. Simmons are pitch-perfect as a couple of bland, weary CIA officials struggling to make sense of the whole twisted affair - their final scene together is a subtle, deftly-played wrap-up that had me howling in giddy disbelief as the closing credits appeared, aghast that the Coen brothers had pulled off something so audaciously messed up.

In the end, Burn After Reading won't appeal to everyone, which is something Joel and Ethan Coen have never seemed overly concerned about. They appear content to make whatever kind of film strikes their fancy at the time and let it find whatever audience happens to latch onto it. I've always liked filmmakers who work like that, and I'm glad I latched onto this one, because not only did I have a grand time watching it, but the characters have been running around inside my head all day re-enacting scenes from the film, and I kinda like it.

Review: Forgetting Sarah Marshall

****½ / *****

Kemo: "Sarah Marshall.
Peter: Yes. How did you know I was dating Sarah Marshall?
Kemo: Dwayne told me. Chuck told me. Even Rachel told me. I heard about it from everybody. You gotta stop talking about it. It's like "The Sopranos." It's *over*. Find a new show."

Photobucket

Jason Segel follows Seth Rogen as the next Judd Apatow-produced regular to be an unlikely leading man and show off solid writing chops - this time, in the same film. Following the forgettable Drillbit Taylor, this raunchy and sweet romantic comedy shows that as long as Apatow keeps mining the cast and crews of his old cult TV shows "Freaks and Geeks" and "Undeclared," he'll more often than not be able to deliver the startlingly frank brand of humour he has become known for lately.

Directed by Nicholas Stoller (a writer for "Undeclared"), Forgetting Sarah Marshall follows a heartbroken puppy-dog named Peter Bretter (Segel) after being dumped by his famous TV-actress girlfriend, Sarah Marshall (Kirsten Bell). It turns out Peter is a non-motivated musician who's coasting because he can, since he landed the plum job of creating cheesy, brooding "mood music" for Sarah's "CSI"-like prime-time detective show.

Like Knocked Up, it does stretch believability to have a dumpy guy going out with a gorgeous TV star, but average-looking guys should thank Apatow and his stable of wish-fulfillment writers and actors for making it seem a little more likely that this kind of thing happens. It is too convenient to have sad-sack Peter go on a vacation by himself in Hawaii at the urging of his happily-married cousin (Bill Hader) and then unknowingly end up at the same hotel as his ex and her new British rock star boyfriend, Aldous Snow (Russell Brand). But this is easy to forgive, because in the confines of this typical set-up, Segel and company score over and over again with terrifically witty interplay and very funny situations.

Like Apatow and Seth Rogen before him, Segel nails the comedy so perfectly because he sticks to what he knows. Not only is the raunchiness a full-force part of the script, integrated seamlessly with that inherent sweetness that makes it all go down a little easier, but Segel also lampoons the hell out of Hollywood types - people with that unique mix of egotism and lack of self-confidence that comes with having jobs in the entertainment industry. (Segel's most recent gig is on the fabulous show "How I Met Your Mother," while Bell has been on hit TV shows since "Veronica Mars.")

I've always enjoyed films (and their writing) in which neither character is what you'd call a "villain." One of the reasons why I enjoy Apatow's stuff so much (and I mean even before he became world-famous) is because it usually does that. And Forgetting Sarah Marshall plays a delicate balancing act the entire time as well. As in most break-ups (depending on whose side you take), one person looks evil and the other completely sympathetic. That is, until the details about the relationship known only to the two start to come out. During the course of this film, there's a subtle switch happening that allows both characters to showcase their weak sides.

It all culminates with an indefensible act that is uncomfortably (and ingeniously) played for laughs. Like the infamous pregnant bedroom scene in Knocked Up, Segel breaks down another sacred behind-closed-doors sex situation that no one likes to talk about, and ends up with a classic memorable moment.

A super-solid supporting cast including Hader, Jonah Hill, Paul Rudd, and Mila Kunis - who is a real eye-opener in a tricky role - navigate the audience through some unlikely twists and turns, making sure that the characters never delve into parody. British comedian Brand, in a role that will surely open many doors for him, could have turned one-note faster than you can say "Bittersweet Symphony," almost steals the entire show as laid-back rock star Aldous. Besides being the only truly confident character in the film, he is so casual about his celebrity status that it makes his unexpectedly blunt remarks even more hilarious.

Forgetting Sarah Marshall may not contain all of the hardcore truths about modern male/female relationships that made Knocked Up so brilliant, but it has more than its fair share of uncomfortable and familiar situations. Segel's characters talk like real people and Stoller's direction keeps a close watch on their emotional trials, and a knowing eye on the punchline at all times.

Apatow is creating a solid body of work (with the occasional, forgiveable misstep) that is approaching household-name familiarity. Like Christopher Guest's stable of cult-favourite improv actors, the Apatow players make us smile by just entering the frame. My friends and I laughed heartily each time Rudd, Hill, or any other recognizable face showed up on the screen. The time of Meg Ryan, Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts, and Sandra Bullock has (thank God) passed and the nerds and their too-hot dates have taken over. When people look back at this time in Film history, Apatow's potent, frank, and sweet comedies will absolutely define this era of mainstream filmmaking.

"How you served five years under her, I don't know. You deserve a medal, or a holiday or at least a cuddle from somebody."

Review: Sunshine

****½ / *****

"At the end of time, a moment will come when just one man remains. Then the moment will pass. Man will be gone. There will be nothing to show that we were ever here... but stardust."

Photobucket

Alright, first things first: I'm not a Sci-Fi fan. Never was, and probably never will be. Of course, that doesn't interfere (at all) with my ability to admire and appreciate sacred classics like 2001, Star Wars or Alien. I might not worship them like millions do, but I sure as hell respect them. But, present day speaking, I honestly don't think the genre has much more to offer. And this isn't a criticism, it's just the way it is. I mean, with the exception of The Matrix and Joss Whedon's "Firefly" series / Serenity, we saw nothing new in the last decade. Pretty much everything was already done. Space missions / adventures, aliens, robots, time travels... what's left? Even though I'm a pretty deep believer in the human creativity, I just think the genre is too self-limitative.

That doesn't mean, as you obviously already figured out from my rating, that I didn't enjoy Danny Boyle's attempt, with Sunshine. It might be hard to believe, given his filmography so far, but he is a genuine Sci-Fi fanatic, and his passion is pretty clear when you watch the film. Of course, I still stick to what I said before: it doesn't bring anything new. Fifty years in the future, spaceship plus eight men / women crew. Mission: save the world. I can think of half a dozen films that can fit that description. Still, Sunshine is ahead of them all.

Even though, like I said, it isn't as innovative as it would be expected from Boyle/Garland (like 28 Days Later... was) it doesn't fall in clichés either and has no predictability whatsoever. The last quarter of the film completely switches the direction in which the story was going and it goes from Sci-Fi / Drama to Suspense / Thriller in a heartbeat. The end was also pretty unexpected. No smiley happy endings and, to whoever may be able to get it, it even has its share of poetic and beautiful. Apart from that, expect the always stunning camera work from Boyle (the use of cameras on the inside of the helmets was particularly brilliant) and also a flawless cast. Even Chris Evans, an American pretty boy, is solid, which (re)proves that Boyle is the ultimate actors' director.

"So if you wake up one morning and it's a particularly beautiful day, you'll know we made it. Okay, I'm signing out."

Review: Zack and Miri Make a Porno

****½ / *****

"I'm a guy. You give me two popsicle sticks and a rubber band and I'll find a way to fuck it like a filthy MacGyver!"

With the casting of Seth Rogen as his lead, I've heard people dismiss Zack and Miri Make a Porno as Kevin Smith's attempt to be Judd Apatow. I can't think of anything more spectacularly unfair. Kevin Smith was pulling off raunchy humour with a heart of gold long before we'd even heard the name Apatow, he's just never gotten the same kind of credit for it. If anything, that's probably because Smith is often less interested in the heavy dramatic elements Apatow uses to win critics and audiences over. Smith is, self-admittedly, into dick jokes. Usually there's a touch of dramatic sweetness mixed in, especially in some of his more poignant, focused films like Clerks II and Chasing Amy, but more often than not he's there for a laugh, the dirtier the better.

Photobucket

That said, Zack and Miri Make a Porno is the ultimate embodiment of Kevin Smith's cock = comedy philosophy. It's pure comedy. But the thing about Smith is that he also has the unique ability to find the tenderest of emotions in the most profane of situations, and that talent is what makes Zack and Miri Make a Porno more than just a one-note dirty joke. Not that there aren't a lot of dirty jokes working here. There are. A LOT. Frequently. Mostly.

The Zack and Miri in question (Rogen and Elizabeth Banks) have been best friends forever and roommates for the 10 years since they graduated from high school. There is nothing they don't know about each other, and nothing they can't discuss with one another, including their preferred sex toys. Platonic friends, it is important to note because that's all about to change, but it takes more than just a moment of hormonal weakness and the cable being out. It takes a 10-year high school reunion, the revelation that Miri's crush is now the significant other of a gay porn star, and the video taken surreptitiously of Miri in her granny panties to all coalesce just as the duo have their power and water cut off for non-payment.

Zack, who has spent 10 years whipping up espresso drinks at the local coffee house, is not what is characterized as bright, but he is suddenly focused for the first time in his slacker life and that's when the idea is born as they burn their unpaid bills in a garbage can in their living room to keep warm. They will make a porno in which they will star, sell it to the class mailing list, which will not only get them out of debt, but it will also get them a decent apartment. It gets more complicated than that. Zack's hen-pecked and racially touchy co-worked at Bean N Gone will front the money for the camera in exchange for a share of the profits and a chance to audition the, ahem, talent (he's just going to look, really). Local strippers will add their distinctive and novel talents to the action, and hockey player with anger management issues will record it all. As Zack puts it in a burst of innocence, naïveté and zeal that is what got pretty much every filmmaker into the business and then into trouble, it's a movie, what could go wrong?

The film they're making is pornographic, and so are the auditions and planning, but the relationship between Zack and Miri is so honest, so accepting, that it's not just admirable, it's enviable. When they finally do have sex for the camera, of course it turns out differently than planned. None of the talking they did beforehand about it matters. Of course by then the audience is so emotionally invested in these amiable folks that they're rooting for them to realize that they're the ones they have been waiting for. As for the rest of the cast, including Smith veteran Jason Mewes and porn-legend Traci Lords, they are quirky, but so matter-of-fact about what they're doing with dildos and soap bubbles and fiercely simulated penetration, that it somehow doesn't come across as dirty. Mostly.

Smith never makes it sentimental, but he nails the emotions with a deft touch. It's not what Zack and Miri say to each other, it's how Rogen and Banks say it and how Smith can turn a particularly inept moment from a very low-rent porno into the stuff of which true romance is made. And how a look can change everything, and another one change everything again. On the other end of the spectrum, he lards the film with political incorrectness, making sport of the pretension and the opportunism of it. His women are empowered, even if some of them are naked, yet there is no one in this film with an ego complex, except maybe Brandon, the gay porn star played by Justin Long in a performance that takes camp and true passion into unexpected, wonderful territories. They're all nobodies trying to get by and maybe grab just a little piece of the American Dream. Or at least be able to take a shower at home again.

Zack and Miri Make a Porno celebrates friendship, sexuality, and true love without making them mutually exclusive. What makes it a pithy and piquant delight is that it does so by using the sort of idioms that raise the highest hackles among the self-righteous keepers of public morals. The juxtaposition is breathtaking and oddly refreshing. This ain't a romance novel, but it is the most romantic film involving porno that's ever been made.

Review: Iron Man

**** / *****

"It's not a piece of equipment. It's a suit. It's me!"

He's not Batman or Superman. He's not in the public consciousness the way the Dark Knight or the Caped Crusader Man of Steel are. He's beloved by legions of comic fans, but they're a far more select crowd. Our pop-culture lobes aren't cluttered with the faces of half a dozen different actors who've played him over the last half century, or with the memories of the earnest 50s black-and-white TV dramas or the campy candy-coloured 60s sitcoms in which he fought evil and embodied the spirit of the era.

Photobucket

No, there's just this film, now, and what a doozy of a popcorn-a-licious introduction to Iron Man it is. It spells certain ruin for future incarnations unless they are very, very good indeed, for when someone makes "Iron Man: The Web Series" in 2026 and someone else reboots Iron Man for 3D sensesurround films in 2043, everyone will be all, "Oh, but Robert Downey Jr. will always be Iron Man for me," and, "Oh, but no one can do it like Jon Favreau did."

This might well be the perfect comic book film, actually. It's just pertinent enough to feel like it's set in something like the real world and just tongue-in-cheek enough not to get too heavy about it, but it's got enough self-respect to be sincere. It manages to be funny in more places than you might imagine without winking at itself, like it doesn't know it's a comic book flick, and that all sorts of smirking and jabs in the ribs are supposed to go along with film adaptations from that medium. Oh, sure, there's no question that this is Iron Man - the spirit of the character is absolutely intact, and though there's been some shuffling around, the faces and names and situations will be completely familiar to fans of the comic series, and will pay off in ways they'll be able to predict. But the key thing is: Tony Stark doesn't think he's a "superhero."

And he isn't. He has no superpowers, unless genius and a preternatural ability to charm the ladies count. Nope: Stark is just your run-of-the-mill billionaire playboy geek - he's Bill Gates with Austin Powers' mojo. He heads up Stark Industries, a weapons contractor with sidelines in a few more philanthropical arenas for the PR value, but he's not just a businessman: he actually designs and builds his deadly toys. He's a brilliant engineer and inventor... as well as an inveterate party animal who just so happens to be as gorgeous and charismatic (if in a slightly smarmy way) as Robert Downey Jr.

The funny stuff? It's all Downey and the easygoing, reflexive snark that is his trademark. Which isn't to say that he's not a vital part of the whole self-respecting sincerity of Iron Man: his snark is, as it always is, his way of armouring a character with deep and intriguing flaws against having to acknowledge those flaws. (One recurring joke about how Stark treats the robotics in his private lab, the kind of robots you might see in an automobile factory, like pet dogs or even sentient creatures, is layered with poignancy because he probably does count these machines as among his very few close relationships.)

And when Stark is angry? Downey is nuclear with it - like a slow meltdown, not like a mushroom cloud. But whether Downey is gearing Stark toward funny or mad or somewhere in between - his relationship with his human assistant, Pepper (Gwyneth Paltrow) is fraught with all sorts of interpersonal land-mines that make for some of the film's best moments - Downey exudes a sense of effortlessness, as if he were just making it all up as he goes. Some of Stark's offhandedness was clearly given by Downey, but surely the four credited screenwriters - Mark Fergus and Hawk Ostby (both of whom worked on Children of Men and First Snow), and newcomers Art Marcum and Matt Holloway - contributed their fair share. Downey can't have done it all on his own: it just feels that way.

Jon Favreau, being an actor himself, knows to just stay the hell out of Downey's way and let him run with a story so deceptively simple that it really does seem as if it's Faveau's star doing all the embellishing. On a trip to Afghanistan to push a new weapons system on the U.S. army, Stark is injured and kidnapped by cave-dwelling terrorists, and it's a full hour into the film - not that it drags or anything - before Stark has whipped up his first flying suit of armour as a way to escape. Refinements to the suit come later, but there's relatively little of the crime-fighting you'd expect from this kind of superhero origin story. Stark goes, well, ballistic when he discovers what uses his company's weapons are being put to, and engages in a bit of do-goodery to right that, but still: Stark emphatically isn't a superhero - a few snide Downey asides about what his life would be like if he were a superhero are well played, and only underline the non-comic-booky vibe here, which plays much more in the Sci-Fi sandbox. Think Robocop meets Transformers, not "Batman with metal armour."

But this is, of course, deep down, a superhero origin, and the very funny final line of the film leaves no doubt that there will be a sequel. I say let it come. It's a nice feeling for a film to leave you, for a change, with the sense that that's a promise, not a threat.

sexta-feira, 6 de novembro de 2009

Review: The Fountain

****½ / *****

"For every shadow, no matter how deep, is threatened by morning light."

Darren Aronofsky's The Fountain is dozens of things, but primarily it's a film about love. Countless films address the same topic, or use it as a framework to tell a story, but few are as passionate and insistent in their focus. This isn't the superficial love of pop songs; it's not cynical manipulation. It's a naked, fearless film about Love and Forever, with strident capital letters, about a fierce, time-defying love that connects one couple through a thousand years of history. It's also a poignant mediation on how missed chances can echo forever. It's a bold artistic statement from a director who has never let a limited budget stand in his way. It might not always make perfect sense, but it's one of the best films I've ever seen.

Photobucket

Five hundred years ago, a conquistador named Tomas (Hugh Jackman) vows to the Spanish Queen Isabella (Rachel Weisz) that he will travel to Central America and find the Tree of Life so that they can live together forever. In the present day, a neuroscientist named Tommy Creo (Jackman) is frantically trying to find a cure for cancer to in time to save his wife Izzy (Weisz), who is dying of a brain tumour while attempting to finish a novel about the conquistador and his queen. In his desperation, Tommy turns to some bark from an "old growth" Central American tree, with surprising results. Five hundred years in the future, Tommy floats through space in a sphere containing a gigantic tree, travelling toward a distant nebula as the events of the past thousand years haunt him. According to the film, the Mayans believed that this nebula was their underworld; its location had helped Tomas find the Tree of Life; now Tommy is travelling there so he can be with Izzy forever. After 1000 years, Tommy has learned patience; he does Tae Bo in front of a blanket of stars, and tattoo rings on his skin to remind him of how long he's waited, and how he can wait a little while longer.

Some of the Eastern elements of future-Tommy's world are poorly integrated, and this prompted an involuntary guffaw when future-Tommy and past-Tomas' stories connect in an unexpected way. I wish the sap from the Tree of Life didn't look like Elmer's Glue. I wish Aronofsky hadn't gone with the cheap, artificial tactic of suspense-building music just before the beautiful scene on the roof in the snow. There are significant problems with the past segments of the film: Weisz seemed a little lost as the Queen, forced, as she is, to shoulder a little too much iconographic burden, and the segment lacks the kind of circular resolution that the other segments have. The love between Queen Isabella and Tomas the Conquistador would more properly be called worship, which is part of love but not all. What's missing is tenderness, which develops during the present-day segments. Whatever problems the film might have are all but forgiven here. Their scenes together are almost unbearably tender; it's as if we're intruding on private moments between them. Aronofsky's camera caresses Weisz; his adoration for her is palpable and catching. If she didn't seem up to the earlier segments, she blossoms here. And Jackman shines as well.

If Aronofsky owes a lot to other films, most obviously Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, the specific vision and scope are all his. Many of the amazing special effects were created not via CGI, which Aronofsky felt (rightly) would ruin the film's timelessness, but via micro-photography of chemical reactions in petrie dishes. That's just brilliant: first, because the resulting effects have a vivid three-dimensionality that CGI effects often lack, and second, because the very method of creating the effects ties in with the themes of the film. Aronofsky's limited budget, cut in half after an earlier attempt starring Brad Pitt fell through, is a blessing in other ways. The exteriors are limited, forcing creative transitions between times and places.

I feel like, unlike so many films, The Fountain rewards repeat viewings; there are elements here, thought out in incredible detail, that I missed the first time but I picked up on when I saw it again the next morning. I liked how even in the cold laboratory settings of the present-day segments, Tommy walks through pools of warm, golden light, tying together the torchlight of the past and the nebular light of the future. At first it seemed out of place, but made sense when I thought about it as future-Tommy working through his memories. I liked how the same triangular pattern of the star system with the nebula in the centre kept popping up in the set decoration and shot framings, and also how the starburst pattern from Tomas' shrine to his queen kept showing up in much the same ways. But most of all, I loved how it made me want to believe in forever. There's not a trace of cynicism here, just incredibly honest and emotional filmmaking that's not afraid to slip up in its pursuit of something beautiful, yet flawed. It's cinematic poetry in an age when poetry is considered quaint. It's the kind of film that makes me want to get up in the morning.

"Together we will live forever."

Review: A Girl Cut in Two

**** / *****

Gabrielle: "What do you do for a living?
Paul: I live."

Some filmmakers, like Chaplin and Kubrick, determined that they should release a film only every few years, to make it more like an event to be anticipated. Others work faster and harder in an effort not to be forgotten, like Spike Lee or Woody Allen. It's difficult to determine which method is more effective, but it seems like if a filmmaker turns in over fifty films of mostly high quality, their work is eventually taken for granted. Everyone loves Hitchcock now, but in 1976 when his final film opened, he must have seemed like a relic compared to Rocky and Taxi Driver.

Photobucket

That's how I imagine Claude Chabrol today. Now 78, he releases a film a year, more or less, and passed the fifty-film marker some time ago. Unlike his Nouvelle Vague colleagues, he didn't make a recognizable "masterpiece" in his youth, a film that anyone can quote out of their heads as essential to the movement, and so has nothing to live up to. Rather, he's consistently reliable and skillful, and it's difficult to judge any one of his films up against another. Look through reviews of his most recent films, and for each one you'll find at least one person claiming it's his best film in years.

And so comes A Girl Cut in Two. I loved it. It's another superbly-made, highly enjoyable Chabrol film, but you probably won't see it on any top ten lists, nor will Chabrol be collecting any awards for it. I think "consistent" is a bad word among film people; we're more easily impressed by change and diversity, or by the newest, latest thing. Actors like John Wayne were routinely overlooked in favour of the Brandos and the James Deans, though Brando could never in a million years have pulled off what John Wayne accomplished in The Searchers. Brando could do lots of things, but John Wayne was the best at being John Wayne. That's my standard rant, and that's how I feel about Chabrol. Now, onto the film:

Co-written by Cécile Maistre, Chabrol's frequent assistant director, A Girl Cut in Two tells the story of a love triangle. A beautiful, ambitious TV weather girl, Gabrielle (Ludivine Sagnier, in her most full-bodied performance yet), falls for the much older, but successful, married writer Charles Saint-Denis (François Berléand, Inspector Tarconi on the Transporter films). It's an interesting game of seduction, as both players appear to be out-scheming one another. Gabrielle comes on to him at a book signing. When he takes her to his empty city apartment (away from his country house), she's fully aware of his intentions, and she lets him get away with it. Later, he turns the tables by brushing her off, even though she seems truly smitten with him. However, at work Gabrielle knows just how to pull the strings to get herself advanced to a better job, even if it means stepping on a few people who are in the way.

At the same time, a snotty, rich younger man, Paul (Benoît Magimel, Haneke's La Pianiste) is swept away by Gabrielle and even more intrigued by her indifference to him. His usual method of throwing money around doesn't seem to work on her. She can see right through him; he behaves like a genuine twit with his family, and he openly hates Charles. Because Charles is devoted to his wife, Gabrielle gives up and gives in to Paul, even agreeing to marry him. She grants Charles one chance to leave his wife and stop the wedding. From there, I won't say any more since the film doesn't quite go where you would expect. What Chabrol does here that's so remarkable is to establish a light tone, almost a black comedy, for the film's first two thirds, and then effortlessly switches to his creeping dread tone for the final stretch, without leaving anyone or anything behind. There's no sense of betrayal in this switch, because it feels like absolutely the right thing to do. Best of all is the ending, which wraps up all the film's chord changes in one big crescendo.

Chabrol is a master at dead ends, at setting up peculiar situations that may or may not go anywhere. For example, Charles loves his wife, but he flirts with his sexy publicist Capucine Jamet (the eye-popping Mathilda May, best known for playing the naked alien in Tobe Hooper's Lifeforce). Gabrielle allows her boss at the TV station to flirt with her and call her pet names, while Paul, who is slightly effeminate anyway, has a kind of male companion at his side; this person seems like more of an employee than a friend, someone to clean up after him. In a lesser film, these supporting characters would be dressing, but here they serve to render things a bit more off-kilter. This rich detail serves to complicate the love triangle, placing its multi-faceted participants on relatively even ground, and keeping them on their toes. As a result, A Girl Cut in Two keeps us on our toes as well.

Review: Flight of the Red Balloon

****½ / *****

"Balloon, are you coming or not?"

Paris (and France in general) tends to be a habitat seen in big sweeps and large outside shots, attesting to the ongoing American romanticizing of the City of Lights. The Eiffel Tower looming large in the background, the stoic Arc de Triomphe, the rolling lawns in front of the Basilique du Sacré-Coeur: However intimate the city's candour might be, Film has always taken Paris in with its monuments, landmarks, and open spaces as pieces of a collective familiarity.

Photobucket

With the exception of a lone, beautiful coda within the Musée d'Orsay, the very body responsible for the film's funding, Hou Hsiao-hsien's gorgeous Flight of the Red Balloon drifts away from these environs, making a film about Paris life that seems uninterested in Paris as a city. Based on, or perhaps just familiarized with, Albert Lamorisse's French children's classic, Hsiao-hsien moves the focus from a child and his balloon to a child, his frazzled mum, and his new Chinese nanny, a young filmmaker on a student visa.

In an odd act of attentiveness, the nanny, Song (a great Song Fang), begins to make a student film about the red balloon floating around her arondissement, co-starring her ward, Simon (Simon Iteanu). Explaining how she got the balloon to move exactly how she wanted, Song briefly talks about green screens and the pratfalls of modern, low-budget filmmaking, giving Hsiao-hsien a behind-the-scenes fantasia of sorts within his own film. Simon's father, a writer in self-imposed exile in Montreal, has only one interaction by phone, but his presence is aptly felt through Simon's mother's (Juliette Binoche) barbed interactions with her husband's friend and current tenant, Marc (Hippolyte Girardot).

Binoche is a dream. Like the city in which the film is based, Hsiao-hsien has stripped Binoche of her token abilities: her dark hair mussed and badly dyed into a blonde mess, her usual role as centre of gravity thrown into a state of utter upheaval, her coy beauty mutated into a palette of raw nerves. Yet, through this act of deviation, Binoche gives one of her best performances to date, at once completely spontaneous and thoughtfully patient.

In a year brimming with great French films, it's ironic that the most successful of them would come from a Chinese-born, Taiwan-educated filmmaker. Like Wong Kar-wai's first immersion into foreign language cinema, the English-tongued My Blueberry Nights, Hsiao-hsien continues to study the same tropes of his outstanding Chinese output: loneliness, isolation, stilted love. It also touches on the polarizing effect of city life and travel, a strong force in the master's 2003 tribute to Ozu, Café Lumière. But whereas Wong's exercise coaxes out the director's inevitable faults when not working in his language, Flight of the Red Balloon highlights Hsiao-hsien' staggering strengths, both aesthetically and technically speaking: Like the rest of Hsiao-hsien's oeuvre, his latest feels like the culmination of all his works beforehand.

Working with the masterful cinematographer Mark Lee Ping Bing, Hsiao-hsien, who gave his actors full character histories but no written dialogue, delivers all the film's action in confined settings. A cramped, cluttered apartment, a darkened puppet theatre, the narrow streets of Paris: Somehow these areas breed imagination for Hsiao-hsien's actors. Shot in his patently-resplendent long takes, the aesthetic is seemingly unencumbered, but, coupled with Chu Shih Yi's gentle sound design, the images breathlessly unspool into suites of effortless intricacy.

As Suzanne argues heatedly with Marc downstairs, Hsiao-hsien's camera wanders around the apartment as Song and Simon prepare for a mid-day snack and a blind tuner repairs Suzanne's piano. All the sounds and movements of the characters co-mingle, interact, climax, and then gently descend: You won't see anything as rapturous as this in any film made or released in 2008.

Review: The Red Balloon

***** / *****

"Balloon! you have to obey me and be good."

Do you remember the first time you saw The Red Balloon? If you're of a certain age, you were probably in your third grade classroom eagerly waiting for your teacher to roll in the projector on Film day. If you're on the younger side, though, there's a chance you've never seen this short, sweet masterpiece of French cinema. It's a shame if you didn't see it as a child, but it's not too late to catch up.

Photobucket

The only short film ever to win an Oscar for best original screenplay, Albert Lamorisse's little wonder tells the story of young Pascal (Lamorisse's own son Pascal), a nine-year-old Parisian boy living an ordinary life in a sketchy but absolutely gorgeous and cinematic Parisian neighbourhood until the day that a large red balloon mysteriously floats into his life - and stays.

The magical balloon has puppy-like attributes. Whether Pascal holds the string or not, the balloon follows him faithfully on his daily circuit to and from school, shops, church and vacant lots. A streetcar conductor refuses to let the balloon board, so they race to school together, where the balloon waits outside the door until Pascal returns. When a mean teacher punishes Pascal, the balloon hilariously taunts the teacher in a bit of supernatural slapstick. The balloon even finds its own friend, a big blue balloon held by a little girl.

For an all-too-brief 34 minutes we enjoy the friendship of Pascal and the balloon until a pack of vicious, feral, jealous schoolboys decide to have some fun. Separating Pascal and the balloon, they basically stone the balloon to see if they can pop it. It would be a sin to give away the ending, but suffice it to say the film suddenly elevates, so to speak, to the level of tear-jerking religious parable or, if you're an atheist, to a beautiful "all dogs go to heaven" moment.

The fact that Lamorisse can imbue a simple balloon with so much emotion and then make us emote all over it, is a masterful feat, and one that has rarely been duplicated in film.

Do I give The Red Balloon five stars because I'm hopelessly nostalgic for third grade and the innocence of childhood? Maybe, but I also award the stars because the film is on the list of essentials, and if you missed it as a child, now is the time to make sure you seek it out and watch it. But here's the challenge: Try to watch with child-like eyes.

Review: Molière

***½ / *****

Elmire Jourdain: "Unhappiness has comic aspects one should never underestimate.
Jean-Baptiste Poquelin: How could I joke about that which makes me weep? This type of comedy does not exist.
Elmire Jourdain: Well, then... invent it."


Photobucket

Laurent Tirard's Molière belongs to the sub-genre of fictionalized biopics, which is considerably better than belonging to the traditional biopic genre, now a classification that denotes little more than phony, moldy clichés. Taking its cue from Shakespeare in Love, Tirard's film uses the titular French playwright's life as a jumping-off point for a fanciful tale of romance, duplicity, and acting, Acting, ACTING, imagining the adventure had by the 22-year-old Jean-Baptiste Poquelin, aka Molière (Romain Duris), during a period of months in 1644 when he mysteriously vanished.

It's speculation of the playful sort, as screenwriters Tirard and Grégoire Vigneron cook up a wild saga to serve as the eventual inspiration for the writer's Tartuffe and The Bourgeois Gentleman, both of which are born from his unlikely stay at the opulent estate of arrogant fat cat Monsieur Jourdain (Fabrice Luchini), where he finds himself in the middle of various romantic entanglements. Ruses, double-crosses, and covert kisses ensue, all while Tirard casts his legendary protagonist as a kindred spirit of Preston Sturges' Sullivan, convinced that comedy - his natural calling - is merely the ugly, inferior stepchild to tragedy.

It's a belief anyone with passing knowledge of Molière's work knows will inevitably be torn asunder, and one that's firmly opposed by Molière itself, which fervently embraces the author's brand of frothy farce tinged with melancholy. After a brief framing intro (set in 1658) in which Molière and his troupe return to Paris after a 13-year tour of the countryside, the film flashes back to the artist's early days when he was struggling to make ends meet as a two-bit actor.

Those lean times come to an end after an accidental bit of Chaplin-esque stage buffoonery gets him hired by Jourdain, who wants acting lessons so that he might perform a ridiculously bad, self-penned one-act play (about Greek mythology) for the gorgeous marquise Célimène (Ludivine Sagnier). This must all be done in secret, however, since Jourdain is married to the sharp-eyed Elmire (Laura Morante), a beauty with whom Molière - posing as a priest named Tartuffe who's been commissioned to tutor the younger Jourdain daughter - soon comes to find himself enraptured, and with whom he begins a clandestine affair that proves one of many tricky situations the young playwright is charged with resolving.

Regardless of his subject's swoon-worthy prose, Tirard's decision to have Duris' Molière look like a Fabio-ish romance novel cover model - long locks, a dashing moustache, and a shirt occasionally unbuttoned to his stomach - is a tad too over-the-top. Otherwise, the director crafts his jovial trifle with proficiency, his pacing swift, his story's humour sharp, and his various references to Molière's famous works light and cheeky. What's missing, alas, is a greater sense of surprise that might keep the film from feeling somewhat routinist.

This is most problematic with regards to the sub-plot involving Jourdain's greedy, nefarious acquaintance Dorante (Edouard Baer), a broadly conceived villain profiting off Jourdain's infatuation with Célimène and, later, intent on cementing his bourgeois status by having his son marry Jourdain's elder daughter, who's engaged in her own stealthy trysts with a boy of non-noble birth. Throughout Molière, familiarity is a pressing issue, since its narrative inventiveness isn't quite enough to quell the impression that its myriad complications have been done before, and with slightly more flair.

No fault, however, can be laid at the feat of Tirard's fantastic cast, which by and large brings verve to even the most hackneyed of scenarios. Unlike Baer, whose Dorante remains tiresomely two-dimensional throughout, Luchini skilfully employs exaggerated mannerisms (bug eyes, awkward gestures) as the absurd Jourdain without ever fully succumbing to outright clownishness, and his restraint bestows a pair of third-act confrontations with a much-needed bit of gravity.

Duris, playing what can only be described as any actor's wet dream, expertly colours his title character's quick wit with shades of longing, in the process bringing a touch of soulful depth to the generally frivolous proceedings. It's Morante, however, who truly lends Molière its measure of enchantment. Her Elmire a complex creature of regal authority, burning passion, and maternal responsibility. One look in her dark, lively, intelligent eyes as she sits atop a post-coital bed wrapped in nothing but a white sheet, and it's all too easy to understand what might have finally lit the creative spark in Molière's heart. She also reminds me of my mum, which, now that I think about it, is Freudianly creepy.

Review: Paris

***½ / *****

"Paris. No one's ever happy. We grumble. We enjoy that."

A sort of cinematic tourist brochure, Cédric Klapisch's Paris had all the potential to be a spiritual follow-up to the fabulous Paris, je t'aime. Unfortunately, it feels a bit uneven. Still, considering how much I adore that film, I think my expectations were a little too high. Klapisch (the French auteur whose previous L'Auberge Espagnole remains one of my favourite films) still crafts a heart-warming exploration of the lives, loves and neighbourhoods of the City of Lights. Or, more appropriately, that romantic Paris of our imagination.

Photobucket

Opening with a head-spinning montage of its main players, we meet Romain Duris in the role of Pierre, a cabaret dancer awaiting heart surgery. Juliette Binoche plays Élise, his social-worker sister who moves in to care for him. There's also the aging and cynical History professor Roland, played by Fabrice Luchini, who falls in love with one of his students, the tempestuous Laetitia (Mélanie Laurent, who'll be seen soon in Tarantino's Inglourious Basterds) and an assortment of working-class Parisians falling in and out of amour.

As the film plays out the lives and locales of these people become intertwined, often tenuously, although Klapisch has the good sense not to force the point. And the film is as much about Paris' neighbourhoods as its protagonists: we visit the beautiful Sacré-Coeur, Père Lachaise, the Eiffel Tower and numerous other iconic locations. We also travel to lesser-known districts, including Rungis, a colossal market of fruit crates and meat carcasses. Even these blue-collar suburbs are bathed in a deceptively warm glow by cinematographer Christophe Beaucar.

While the entire cast performs admirably, the film's stand-out performance comes from Duris, who gives Paris its emotional heart. He also acts as our tour guide, observing goings-on from the window of his apartment. "I watch other people live. I wonder who they are, where they go. They become heroes in my little stories," his character says at one point. Binoche is her usual great-self and she even has a little, subtle striptease scene in which she's as gorgeous and sexy as she was twenty years ago.

As is the nature of any multi-character cavalcade, the film suffers from a lack of exposition. Characters are introduced and just as quickly dropped. A plot line regarding a Cameroonian's attempt to illegally make his way to France shows great potential, but is frustratingly underdeveloped. Fortunately, Duris is there as the film's glue, pulling the picture back together whenever it threatens to fall apart. While it might lack a certain emotional gravitas, Paris is nonetheless a light-hearted and satisfying ode to the City of Love.

Review: Bon Voyage

**** / *****

"Not even Hitler wants war."

There's an almost classical grace to Jean-Paul Rappeneau's wartime comedy Bon Voyage, the Cesar-winning effort starring two of the greatest French Film stars of the last 30 years, Isabelle Adjani and Gerard Depardieu. And, as far as classical grace goes when making a comedy, it delivers... although its pleasures, to be honest, are reminiscent less of a bubbly champagne and more of a refined, unadorned table wine.

Photobucket

Distinctively European in rhythm and almost quaint in its period detailing, the film never manages more than a few chuckles - and yet, there's a gentle elegance pervading every frame that is consistently engaging, even when the storyline occasionally loses its firm footing. Perhaps it is because Bon Voyage is a paean to the glamorized war films of the 1940s, or perhaps because it reminds its audiences of star sirens and Hollywood's Golden Age. Whatever the case, Rappeneau has created an immensely pleasant comic diversion that has the rare effect of getting better in one's memory. I've seen it twice so far, and I already can't wait to watch it again.

All of the elements, of course, are meant exactly for this manipulation. Gabriel Yared, the exemplary Oscar-winning composer of The English Patien, The Talented Mr. Ripley, contributes his most lush, romantic score yet to Bon Voyage, playing upon historical Hollywood formulas which extravagantly embellish each moment. Thierry Arbogast, the noted cinematographer who lensed most of Luc Besson's films, clearly shared Yared's passion for 1940s cinematic melodrama; whether having lovers run in the rain, meet on a beach, or run from hired thugs through the forests, every scene could have been easily mistaken for a romantic thriller made sixty years ago. "Casablanca in colour" would be a nice way to sell it.

Perhaps the most unique element, then, to Bon Voyage is that many of the performances (but not all) feel quite contemporary. Is this Rappeneau's choice, or simply an oversight? It makes no matter, even when Adjani, as the aging screen starlet Viviane Denvers, seems to be channeling early Norma Shearer while her co-star Grégori Derangère, makes his writer-slash-romantic-doormat Frédéric Auger seem like a new-generation, Nora Ephron-inspired sensitive hero. In Hollywood equivalence, Bon Voyage would star Greta Garbo and Tom Hanks.

Although there is a jarring disconnect in the performance styles, the film itself never waivers from its period roots. As World War II looms and German forces threaten to occupy France, Viviane and Frédéric are fleeing Paris to Bordeaux, where the French government is convening in exile. Viviane finds security in the arms of Beaufort (Depardieu), a French minister who is trying to save his country while drooling all over the actress, and Alex Winckler (Peter Coyote), a German spy posing as a journalist. Meanwhile, the disconsolate Frédéric begins to fall for Camille (the lovely Virginie Ledoyen), an impassioned student who is trying to get her professor's politically important science experiments out of the country. Bon Voyage is not as maniacally joyful as this circuitous plot may sound; indeed, where it perhaps should be zany, it is merely convoluted.

The singular shining light of the ensemble, as she's been her entire life, is Isabelle Adjani, who leaves nothing to chance in her outsized portrayal of Viviane. Unable to stop acting on screen or off, Viviane is a compendium of self-contained manipulations. To get what she wants, she will either conform or confound the stereotypes of femininity to achieve her immediate goals; however, long-term goals (or thought) evades her in almost every instance, creating some delightful comic moments. Here's a woman who runs through three men in the course of ten minutes... to find a better hotel room. As for Depardieu, he brings a balance of charm and intimidation to a character that could have been a disaster in the hands of a less accomplished actor. Ledoyen and Derangère both exude passion and verve, and Coyote proves to be significantly more versatile than previous roles might suggest.

Posh, stylish, and with very little going on in its head, Bon Voyage is neither as dizzying nor as little entertaining as it could be. The nature and style of Rappeneau's classicism should, in theory, be at odds with its languid pace and divergent genre-hopping (romantic comedy becomes noir mystery becomes political drama), but it somehow works in his favour. It's a tribute to Rappeneau's talent and understanding of the medium - as well as his remarkable team - that the film remains such a fun, charming, and compulsively watchable affair.

Review: A Man and a Woman

****½ / *****

"It's crazy to refuse happiness."

Winner of two Academy Awards - Best Foreign Language Film and Best Original Screenplay - and nominated for other two - Best Actress in a Leading Role (Anouk Aimée) and Best Director - in 1967, Claude Lelouch's A Man and a Woman is a sublime exploration of a love between two people with enough emotional baggage and personal demons to inhibit their chances at happiness. Jean-Louis Trintignant plays Jean-Louis Duroc, a semi-famous race car driver, who by chance meets Anne Gauthier (Aimée) at the Deauville boarding school both of their children attend, and offers her a ride back to Paris. They're each single parents coping with the tragic deaths of their spouses, although in their initial meeting, Anne gives the impression that her husband (Pierre Barouh) - a film stuntman - is still very much alive.

Photobucket

Jean-Louis arrives at the truth quickly enough to offer Anne a ride back to Deauville the following weekend, where they and the children go on a double date of dinner and a boat ride. Thus begins the process by which they fall in love, slowly and organically, through held gazes and lingering hands. And whereas many films would make the jump from the dinner table to the bedroom, Lelouch expands on the flirtation, delaying the pay-off and layering the relationship with his character's backstories, the means by which they've come to this place.

He shows us the untimely death of Anne's husband and the suicide of Jean-Louis' wife after a particularly gruesome crash, but more importantly he shows us a long montage of Anne and her husband completely and totally in love, accompanied by the enchanting sounds of Barouh singing "Samba Saravan." At first it seems like an indulgent flourish by Lelouch that takes the audience away from the romance on screen by showing in detail a past love, but it later gains more resonance as Jean-Louis and Anne grow increasingly closer and Anne attempts to rationalize this move away from a man she loved so dearly, even if he is long dead.

All this culminates in the famous scene where, after Jean-Louis successfully completes the gruelling Monte Carlo Rally, Anne telegraphs him from Paris to tell him, finally, that she loves him. Without delay, Jean-Louis jumps back in the same car he's driven across Europe and speeds toward Paris, telling himself that when a woman sends a telegraph like that, you go to her no matter what, even if that means driving thousands of miles without rest. He reaches her, and they make love for the first time, but as they are, Lelouch cuts to images of Anne and her husband, indicating that while her body is with Jean-Louis, her mind is still devoted to someone else. She's even still wearing his ring. Eventually, Jean-Louis figures out that he's effectively making love by himself and they go their separate ways. It's bittersweet and beautiful at the same time.

The story of A Man and a Woman is endlessly fascinating, made all the more interesting by Lelouch's narrative choices. At numerous points, he eschews dialogue in favour of flashbacks, montages, music, and race commentary. This accomplishes several goals (in addition to making the film more financially feasible). It allows the audience to more easily project themselves into the characters, as an image of two people talking with music replacing the dialogue draws us into the interaction between the characters, rather than distracting us by what they're saying. We naturally assume that what they're saying to each other is similar to what we would say in that situation. As a result, we become more invested in the relationship. It also gives the film the feel of a fairy tale romance, thanks in large part to the enchanting score of Francis Lai and Baden Powell.

Take, for example, the scene at the Monte Carlo Sporting Club where Jean-Louis receives the telegraph. Lelouch puts a camera on a balcony and films it in an uninterrupted long shot as Jean-Louis reads the message, excuses himself from the table, and leaves the ballroom. We hear none of this, but it's clear enough that's what he's doing. Most directors would have either cut to closer shots and given us the dialogue or eliminated the scene altogether, but neither choice would have been as effective. It's a vital part of Jean-Louis' character arc that he leave immediately, and the uninterrupted shots convey that perfectly, but it's also unnecessary that we hear what he says. In fact, it's better that we don't. Lelouch's choice is a perfect balance.

The more celebrated choice of A Man and a Woman is the mixture of scenes shot in colour with those shot in black and white. Much has been written about what Lelouch meant to convey with this device, whether the b/w served as quotation marks or the colour was meant to be a somewhat different version of reality. The answer, however, is almost disappointingly simple. The budget for A Man and a Woman was not large enough to film the entire thing in colour, but the potentially lucrative American market required colour and an investor was willing to supply more money to the project if the film could play the American market. So, Lelouch filmed his interiors in black and white, as planned, and used colour for the exteriors. Simple.

The compromise is a practical one that people have been reading into since the film was released, and may have been a factor in Lelouch's Best Director nomination. It'll surprise no one to hear that the mixture has influenced many filmmakers since (from Woody Allen to Wim Wenders), but had the project been able to raise more funds, it wouldn't have even existed. And for that, we're all thankful.